This isn't really a versus question. Google Ads captures people who already want what you sell. Meta Ads creates want in people who weren't looking. Which you start with depends on whether your trade has existing search demand.
Head to head
| Google Ads | Meta Ads | |
|---|---|---|
| Intent | High — actively searching | Low to medium — interrupted |
| Speed to first lead | Days | Days, but slower to qualified |
| Cost per lead | $30–$120 | $25–$70 |
| Close rate | Higher | Lower, longer cycle |
| Volume ceiling | Limited by search volume | Very high |
| Best for | Urgent, need-it-now work | Considered, visual, high-value work |
| Creative needed | Text ads | Constant photo and video refresh |
Pick by trade
- Emergency plumber, locksmith, auto electrician, mobile mechanic — Google, clearly
- Bathroom renovator, roofer, concreter, landscaper, pool builder — Meta first, Google second
- HVAC, solar, electrician — both, weighted to Google in peak season
- New business with no reviews — Google, because intent covers for weak social proof
Running both is usually cheaper than running one
When a homeowner has already seen your before-and-after videos for two months, your Google ad gets a better click-through rate and your quotes close faster. The channels compound rather than compete.
How to split a limited budget
- 1Under $1,500/month
Pick one. For most trades that's Google. Split budgets this small perform poorly on both platforms.
- 2$1,500–$3,000/month
Go 70/30 toward whichever channel matches your dominant job type.
- 3$3,000+/month
Run both properly, with separate landing pages and separate reporting.
Frequently asked questions
Want this working for your business?
Book a free discovery call. We'll map the search demand in your area, show you what leads should cost, and tell you honestly whether we can help.
Book a discovery call